The Humane Society Veterinary Medical Association (HSVMA) advocates for animals through legislation, publication and litigation. We strive to develop better public policies for animals and advance humane alternatives in veterinary education.

Advocacy

Veterinary Forensics: A Voice for Animal Victims

August 19, 2014
by Beth Wictum, Director, UC Davis Veterinary Genetics Laboratory Forensics Unit

lab_analysis_265x184.jpg
iStockphoto

It wasn’t your typical murder spree. For two months in 2001, two Florida teens went on a two-month killing spree—killing and maiming animals throughout Hillsborough and Pinellas counties. Two bulls were shot with razor arrows, a goat was tortured to death, a mother llama was sodomized and her baby beaten with a broken golf club, and a third llama was slashed with a meat cleaver. It was the blood of one of those llamas that helped put the young men behind bars. At the Forensics Unit of UC Davis’ Veterinary Genetics Laboratory, we see many cases of animal cruelty, dog fighting, and bestiality. Sadly, we can’t help the victims of abuse, but we can help to make a future where their assailants are held accountable and future potential victims are spared.

Forensics speaks volumes

Animals may not speak the same language as humans, but they have a lot they can tell us when they share our lives. At the VGL Forensics Unit, we become their voice when they have something to say—about their abuse, about what they witnessed, or where they have been. Locard’s exchange principle maintains that every contact leaves a trace, and that exchange can bear mute witness to each and every crime. Pet ownership in the U.S. has more than tripled since the 1970s, with over 60 percent of American households now having at least one pet. It is almost impossible to enter a home where a cat or dog lives and not walk away with some of their fur. If you own a cat or dog, you know that their fur accompanies you throughout the day; from your home to your car; from your car to your office. That fur (or saliva, urine, blood, or feces) can become crucial evidence in forensic investigations.

Twenty years ago, DNA profiling using short tandem repeats, or STRs—short inherited sequences of DNA that vary in length and can be used as molecular markers and for genetic fingerprinting--was just starting to be widely used for analyzing human biological evidence. Animal DNA testing using the same techniques was largely reserved for confirming parentage and testing for genetic traits or diseases. Today, animal forensics has become an important tool as investigators reach out in hard-to-solve cases to develop new leads or to confirm lines of investigation. While still not as widely recognized as human DNA profiling, animal DNA profiling has been used in every state of the U.S. to link both human and animal victims to offenders.

Veterinary forensics helps humans, too

It all began in 1999 when the UC Davis Veterinary Genetics Laboratory received an unusual request. We were contacted by a sheriff’s office from rural Iowa to see if we could match urine swabbed from a suspect’s truck tire to a victim’s dog. A young woman working in her garden was assaulted by a man who had driven up, asking for directions. When she approached his truck, he tried to sexually assault her and drag her into the vehicle, but she managed to get away. Although she wasn’t able to identify the suspect in a police line-up, she did remember her black and white Border Collie-mix lifting his leg on one of the truck tires. We were excited to find a DNA match and, with that information, the suspect pled guilty and served two years for attempted assault. This was the first time it became clear to us there was a need for a forensic laboratory dedicated to animal DNA profiling. Since that time, we have applied those techniques—and developed new ones—to bring the emerging field of veterinary forensic science to the same standards as human crime laboratories. In 2010, the Forensic Unit of the Veterinary Genetics Laboratory became the first crime laboratory in the world to be accredited for forensic DNA profiling of domestic animals.

The majority of our cases are from the U.S. and Canada, with occasional cases arriving from Great Britain, South America, Australia and Japan as investigators seek out expertise in this specialized area. As part of one of the largest animal DNA testing laboratories in the world, we have databases available for dogs, cats, horses, cattle, sheep, goats, pigs, deer, elk, wolves, coyotes, bear, llamas, and alpacas--providing for a diverse range of potential cases.

Solving a wide range of crimes

Animal evidence can help solve a wide range of cases from animal cruelty or theft, to animal attacks on humans or other animals, and human-on-human crimes like robbery, rape, and murder where there is a transfer of evidence. Dog feces evidence collected from clothing in two different violent crimes was analyzed and presented in court to help convict defendants in a triple homicide and in a rape. Besides being the “witness” at a crime scene, animals themselves are frequently the victims of crimes.  Blood evidence found on the clothing of burglary suspects who silenced barking dogs by slitting their throats or by placing them in a lit oven has been used to prosecute offenders.

Domestic violence often involves animal abuse

Often animals are tortured or killed by someone trying to control another person in domestic violence situations. Up to 80 percent of women arriving at domestic violence centers report animal abuse by their partners. In the case of Jeffrey Nally Jr., his girlfriend’s mother reported that her daughter was being held against her will and that Nally had threatened to kill her if she tried to leave. A search of his home revealed 29 dog carcasses and three live puppies. On the day he was arrested, Nally had terrorized his girlfriend by forcing her to hold a puppy while he drilled into its head. Hair recovered from the drill was matched to the dead puppy and blood found on a hammer was matched to another body found on the property. Nally pled guilty to a lesser charge of nine counts of animal cruelty and weapons possession. With every state now providing a felony crime for animal cruelty, it has been well documented that animal cruelty is a significant indicator for violent criminal behavior against humans as well.

DNA profiling

Unlike what you may see on television, not every sample yields a DNA profile. Pet hair is the most commonly collected item of non-human biological evidence and is not suited to individual (nuclear) DNA profiling. However—unlike humans—dog and cat hairs without roots can yield enough DNA for individual DNA profiling. That’s because when they groom themselves, they are leaving saliva on the hair shafts—and that saliva contains cells. About 1 in 15 shed dog hairs will have enough nuclear DNA for individual profiling. The more fastidious cats average about 1 in 4 hairs with sufficient nuclear DNA. The likelihood of getting that DNA profile goes down when those hairs have been laundered, buried, immersed, or have had prolonged exposure to the outdoor environment. Even in those cases, the mitochondrial DNA found in the cytoplasm of all animal cells can be tested to include or exclude a contributor.

Mitochondrial DNA has many more copies in each cell and is more stable due to its circular shape. Because it persists longer than nuclear DNA, it is especially useful when samples are degraded. It is inherited through the maternal line, so everyone—people and animals—has the same mitochondrial DNA as their mother. Even though it is not unique to an individual, it can identify or exclude possible contributors and assist in the progress of an investigation. It is also commonly used to identify the species of an unknown sample.

Proper collection of evidence is essential

As veterinary professionals, you are often the first people that enforcement officers turn to when they encounter a case involving an animal. It’s important to correctly collect and document potential DNA evidence. Some tips to keep in mind if you handle a case with potential DNA evidence are:

  • Seal, identify, date and initial envelopes or sample containers
  • Clip fur from bite areas of the victim’s body
  • In a dog-on-dog attack, try to minimize contaminating DNA from the victim
  • Do not store samples in formalin
  • Create an accurate record in case it goes to court
  • For more information on sample collection, visit http://www.vgl.ucdavis.edu/forensics/collection.php

As the only lab in the country doing this type of work, we feel very fortunate to be at the forefront of an interesting, diverse, and evolving field. It’s especially rewarding when we hear from pet owners who have found peace thanks to our work. While we can’t relieve the suffering of innocent animals, we can take comfort that we’re making the world a better place by helping to get abusers off the streets and preventing more animals from being victimized.


Beth Wictum
Beth Wictum

Beth Wictum first began her career in animal profiling in 1979 after obtaining her B.S. in Zoology. In the early 90s she helped lead the transition from blood typing to DNA typing in domestic animals, where she developed identity panels and disease diagnostic tests for horse, dog, cattle, and elk. As the demand grew for forensic testing, she was tapped to lead that unit, switching entirely to forensics in 2000. She is a member of the American Academy of Forensics Sciences, the California Association of Crime Lab Directors, the International Society for Animal Genetics forensic standing committee, the Society for Wildlife Forensic Sciences proficiency testing board, and has acted as an advisor to the Scientific Working Group for Wildlife and the Judicial Council of California Science and the Law steering committee. She can be reached at [email protected]. For more information about VGL Forensics, visit http://www.vgl.ucdavis.edu/forensics.

 
Advocacy
Read more...
 
Resolution to Improve Sow Welfare Passes
Advocacy
Friday, July 25, 2014 04:57 PM

The American Veterinary Medical Association will amend its policy statement on pregnant sow housing to include language that will advocate for improved sow welfare. The organization's House of Delegates passed Resolution #3, which called for the policy change. Under the measure, sows will be provided with adequate quality and quantity of space that allows them to assume normal postures and express normal patterns of behaviors. Dr. Barry Kellogg, senior veterinary advisor for the Humane Society Veterinary Medical Association issued the following statement:

Read more...
 
Advocacy


Field Mortalities in Wildlife Research
It’s Time for a Conversation

July 21, 2014
by Jon Geller, DVM, DABVP

elk_carcass_dart_300x225.jpg
Rocky Mountain Park, December 2011, NPS Research Project on Chronic Wasting Disease. Click to enlarge.  Dr. John Geller

If you happened to be driving up the road alongside Moraine Park in Rocky Mountain National Park in December of 2011, as I was, you would have been surprised to first note a coyote, and then a mountain lion, in plain sight in a meadow right next to the road. Shortly after, you would have come upon an elk carcass surrounded by large crimson patches of blood-stained snow. On closer inspection, you would have seen an injectable dart lying next to the carcass, containing remnants of carfentanil and xylazine. You might have become concerned since a few drops of carfentanil could be deadly to a child who might also be exploring the carcass, not to mention the magpie perched on the exposed sternum and the other scavengers and predators observed nearby.

Principal Investigators for government-funded field research projects must submit proposed studies to the appropriate Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee, or IACUC, to ensure compliance with the Animal Welfare Act. Unfortunately, unlike institutional animal research, there is no protocol for project inspection or follow up, often leading to unfortunate outcomes that may not be reported. Unforeseen anesthetic complications, intra-species transmissions of disease, adverse effects of outdated and AWA-noncompliant protocols, and participation by underqualified and under-skilled personnel coalesce to prompt a call for an extensive review of IACUC protocols related to wildlife field research.

dart_sedation_elk_300x225.jpg
Mid-abdomen shot in Rocky Mountain Park. Click to enlarge.  Dr. John Geller

According to National Park Service reports1, a rafter floating down the Colorado River through the Grand Canyon in August 2012 would have been surprised to see several wildlife biologists in a motorized dory taking aim at a Desert Bighorn sheep grazing along the riverbanks. The rafter would not have heard the dart bite into the sheep’s skin and underlying muscle, but would instead have seen the sheep buckle to her knees and then collapse into recumbency. They would have witnessed a frantic effort on the part of the biologists to resuscitate the sheep, unfortunately, without the assistance of the attending veterinarian who was supposed to accompany them. The mis-aimed dart had penetrated the sheep’s abdomen, causing hemorrhage and death. The biologists had not yet secured approval for their research project, resulting in an immediate shut-down and investigation once the Park authorities were notified of the fatality. A year later, the same PI and dart shooter were allowed to recommence their project—without consequences, tighter controls or follow up.

Several capture methodologies that have been used for years require further scrutiny, because they both are ineffective and cause pain and suffering. Fans of quantum physics (aren’t we all?) are aware that the mere act of studying subatomic particles changes those particles’ behavior2. That principle applies to wildlife research subjects as well. For example, leg-hold traps used in wolf studies have evolved to include padding, triggered sedatives (phenothiazines), and remote notification of researchers in order to decrease wolves’ time in the trap. Many of the wolves are then radio-collared to study their future movements and migrations. However, trap refinements are of no benefit if the wolves under study alter their behavior, daily migrations, and travel patterns as a result of the disrupting trap-line.

Electro-fishing is popular among fish biologists and veterinarians studying fish because the resulting shock temporarily stuns all fish in the area, allowing collection of the species under study. Unfortunately, radiographic studies are showing a high number of vertebral fractures—due to the violent axial muscle contractions—causing permanent impairments. Further discussion is needed about whether this methodology complies with the AWA.

sedated_bull_elk_300x225.jpg
Restraining a sedated bull elk in Rocky Mountain Park.  Dr. John Geller

Many wildlife research projects involve powerful sedatives and tranquilizers with complex physiologic effects. In many cases, however, a qualified wildlife veterinarian is not present, sometimes resulting in significant morbidity and mortality. These adverse outcomes could be minimized if someone with the anesthesia training and knowledge of pharmaceutical effects on physiology had been present. IACUC’s could require that a wildlife-qualified veterinarian be present for all field anesthesia of large or endangered mammals.

The argument for putting a temporary halt to wildlife research proposals could not be stronger than in cases where man-made disease is inadvertently introduced into a population, resulting in out-of-control spread, transmission, and potential species collapse. In the late 1960s and early 1970s, researchers at Colorado State University and the Colorado Division of Wildlife collected large numbers of white-tail deer from various locations and placed them in pens in the foothills west of Fort Collins. The result, 40 years later, is unstoppable transmission and increasing incidence of Chronic Wasting Disease, now affecting deer, moose, and elk in 15 states and seven provinces of Canada. There is no current treatment or prevention. In the words of one prominent epidemiologist with the Centers for Disease Control Prevention, “I have no doubt that Chronic Wasting Disease is a man-made disease.” In his opinion, CWD was most likely introduced into this deer herd by cross-species transmission and modification of scrapie from sheep that previously inhabited the pens.

Field studies, as opposed to field research projects, gain summary IACUC approval because they presumptively do not cause pain or distress, or significantly alter the behavior of the animals being studied, and are Intended to be mostly observational in nature. Because of their potential effects on behavior and stress levels, field studies may not be as benign as depicted.

captive_bison_csu_300x225.jpg
Captive bison herd at CSU Foothills Campus following rabies outbreak.  Dr. John Geller

If you were near the bison pens in the Foothills west of Fort Collins, Colo., on May 12, 2012, you would have noted a skunk wandering erratically in the pen, just as the animal caretaker did. Captive wildlife are not immune to researcher and IACUC oversights. USDA-APHIS investigators involved in a 2012 embryo transfer project with captive Yellowstone bison failed to vaccinate the herd after numerous skunk rabies confirmations in the area, and the disoriented skunk was found wandering in the pen. Three weeks later, three of the bison dropped dead, two with confirmed rabies after brain histopath. The third bison was never necropsied.3,4

It’s time for a conversation. The veterinary profession should collaborate with the Wildlife Disease Association, the American College of Zoological Medicine and other professional wildlife organizations to brainstorm refinements to the wildlife research project approval, inspection, and follow-up processes before more damage is done. An umbrella group could be charged with expediting collaboration among existing IACUC’s to accomplish this task. Let’s slow things down so we can get it right. Pending proposals for field research projects should be triaged or put on hold until these issues are addressed. The HSVMA can be an important voice in getting this accomplished.

 

REFERENCES

  1. Briefing Statement, National Park Service IACUC, Sept.6, 2012,
  2. Hawking, S., Mlodinow, L., “The Grand Design”, Random House, New York 2010
  3. Larimer County Colorado Dept. of Health and Env. News Release, June 29, 2012
  4. Rhyan, C., Van Campen, H. et al, Rabies Deaths in Two Bison, Case Rep Vet Med. 2013;2013(0):906782. 1-3. 8 Refs

Dr. John Geller

Dr. Jon Geller graduated from Colorado State University College of Veterinary Medicine in 1995, and currently works full time as an emergency veterinarian and hospital director at Veterinary Emergency and Rehabilitation Hospital in Fort Collins, Colo. In 2009, he became certified by the American Board of Veterinary Practitioners in Canine and Feline medicine. In 2010 he joined the National Park Service as a member of their newly-formed IACUC committee, and also worked as a volunteer veterinarian on several field research projects with elk. He has participated with HSVMA with several RAVS trips, including international projects to help start a surgical and emergency training program for veterinarians in Mexico.

 
Advocacy


Inhumane Exotic Pet Trade Endangers Captive Primates and People

July 21, 2014
by Barbara Hodges, DVM, MBA – HSVMA Veterinary Advisor

Charla Nash on Capitol Hill
On July 10, Charla Nash was joined by The Humane Society of the United States' President and CEO, Wayne Pacelle (right), and members of Congress, including Rep. Earl Blumenauer, D-Ore. (left) and Sen. Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn. (center right) on Capitol Hill to advocate for the swift passage of the Captive Primate Safety Act.  Pete Marovich/The HSUS

Pending federal legislation known as the Captive Primate Safety Act (S.1463/H.R.2856) would prohibit interstate commerce in monkeys, apes, and other non-human primates by prohibiting the transport of primates across state lines for the exotic pet trade. It would not constrain zoos, research facilities, universities, or wildlife sanctuaries.

This bill would protect both primates and people. Privately-owned captive primates are often deprived of the opportunity to perform many of their natural physical and social behaviors. And captive primates themselves pose significant public health and safety risks because humans—the primates’ caretakers and members of the greater community—are under the threat of serious injuries as well as the spread of life-threatening zoonoses such as tuberculosis, Ebola, and Herpes B infections.

Since 1990, at least 275 people—including many children—have been injured by primates. In 2009 in Stamford, Conn., Charla Nash was attacked and mutilated by a friend’s chimpanzee. She lost both hands, her nose, lips, and eyelids, and was blinded due to a zoonotic infection transmitted during the attack. Ms. Nash has suffered tremendously as a result of this disfigurement, and she has undergone complete facial transplant surgery.

At least half of all U.S. states currently prohibit the private possession of primates to some degree. However, federal legislation is necessary to bolster state law enforcement efforts since many sales of captive primates are transacted via the Internet or through out-of-state dealers and auctions. On a broader scale, a federal law would also be helpful in promoting global species conservation efforts.

HSVMA joins the American Veterinary Medical Association, the Association of Zoos and Aquariums, The Humane Society of the United States, and other animal protection organizations and primatologists, including Dr. Jane Goodall, in condemning private primate ownership. Please join HSVMA in supporting the Captive Primate Safety Act by sending an email to your two U.S. Senators and U.S. Representative through this simple form»

 
<< first < Prev 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Next > last >>

Page 13 of 46